Menu

A separate hearing regarding issues of jurisdiction and admissibility of the case PrivatBank and Finilon v. The RF

Events

The Tribunal decided to hold a separate hearing regarding issues of jurisdiction and admissibility of the case, not considered in previous awards and on the merits by Procedural Resolution No. 3. The Tribunal decided to conduct proceedings on possible damages separately in case the claims of Privatbank and Finilon are satisfied.

PrivatBank vs Russia
Hague
July, 2017
11

Rela­ted

12
September, 2019
A procedural resolution on the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
07
June, 2019
Privatbank recognized the right of the RF to participate in the proceeding to determine the amount of damages
21
May, 2019
The RF expressed a desire to participate in the arbitration on the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
03
May, 2019
The Tribunal issued a procedural resolution on the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
04
February, 2019
The Arbitral Tribunal unanimously delivered a partial award in favor of Privatbank on the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
12
July, 2018
Privatbank and Finilon provided the Tribunal with additional documents on the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
26
January, 2018
Privatbank and Finilon sent their comments on the results of the public hearings on the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
01
November, 2017
The hearing on issues of jurisdiction and admissibility of the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF" in The Hague
27
October, 2017
Comments of Privatbank and Finilon were provided on the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF
16
October, 2017
The report of the appointed expert on civil law of the RF on the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
08
September, 2017
The Tribunal ordered the appointed expert on civil law of the RF to submit a report on certain issues on the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
17
August, 2017
Privatbank and Finilon submitted their comments on the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
24
February, 2017
A unanimous interim award on certain aspects of the jurisdiction and admissibility of the case PrivatBank and Finilon v. The RF
14
October, 2016
Privatbank and Finilon sent their comments on the results of public hearings
12
July, 2016
Public hearings on the jurisdiction and admissibility of the case PrivatBank and Finilon v. The RF
07
July, 2016
The Tribunal rejected the request of the Government of Ukraine to participate in a public hearing of the case of PrivatBank and Finilon v. The RF
03
June, 2016
the Tribunal accepted the application of the Government of Ukraine as a third party in the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF”
24
May, 2016
The Tribunal appointed external experts in the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
22
April, 2016
Privatbank and Finilon provided their comments on the questions posed by the Tribunal
19
March, 2016
Separate hearings on the jurisdiction and admissibility of the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
30
November, 2015
Privatbank and Finilon sent their application to the Tribunal
01
July, 2015
Representatives of the Russian Government refused to recognize the jurisdiction of the Tribunal over the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
30
June, 2015
All the appointments to the Arbitral Tribunal for the case "PrivatBank and Finilon LLC v. the RF" were made
16
June, 2015
Representatives of the Russian Government refused to recognize the jurisdiction of the Tribunal over the case "PrivatBank and Finilon v. the RF"
01
April, 2015
PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon initiated arbitration against the RF
This website uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to the use of cookies.